🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.